When Phil Ensor first tried to warn the world about the perils of the silo mentality, he did not mince his words.
It was 1988, and Ensor, an executive with The Goodyear Tire & Rubber company, had just coined the term “functional silo syndrome” to describe organizations that are structured as an array of independently operating departments or divisions that do not collaborate, share information, or solve problems with each other.
Organizations with this kind of structure, Ensor wrote, have “a very damaging learning disability—it has not learned how to learn, that is, how to diagnose itself and solve its own problems.” Moreover, Ensor argued that organizations afflicted by silos “behave out of a foundation of mistrust and a lack of mutual concern. The genius of people is wasted; individuals are uncommitted; groups are not cohesive. No shared vision exists for people to rally around.”
It is hard to find anyone, even today, who disagrees with Ensor’s decades-old premise. And yet, when I talk with senior business leaders about the biggest challenges they are facing, one of the first things they bring up is their inability to break down silos.
The good news is that we’ve evolved to the point where we know silos are a problem. The bad news is that, nearly 40 years after the problem was identified, we don’t know how to get rid of them.
Why is the silo syndrome so stubborn? For insight, take a look at your executive team.
The need for internal collaboration and partnership is more important now than ever before. With AI, economic conditions, and global tensions driving a fearsome pace of change, organizations must have a high degree of trust at the very top. Executive leaders must share information on what they are doing and the impact it has across the enterprise and look for ways to support other leaders in their challenges.
That’s the theory. In practice, far too many senior leadership teams are living, breathing metaphors for the silo syndrome.
In some ways, this isn’t surprising. Senior leadership teams almost always comprise individuals with profoundly different subject-matter expertise and experience. While they worked their way up through the leadership ranks to the executive team, these leaders were afforded a certain degree of independence and encouraged to lead in whatever way they thought best as long as they were producing results.
At the executive-team level, however, the demands and stakes change drastically.
Now, leaders are being asked to interact with people of different backgrounds and skill sets. This can be a jarring experience for some newly promoted leaders; the comfort of being surrounded by people of similar background is suddenly replaced with the discomfort of increased scrutiny. The end result is often that fear, judgement, and distrust cause them to retreat into the relative safety of their silo.
To avoid falling prey to silo syndrome, executive teams need to learn the skills that promote collaboration and trust.
Specific strategies for breaking down silos and promoting trust can be both formal and informal. But it all starts with setting clear expectations.
It seems that organizations, as they grow and evolve, naturally gravitate to a silo structure without completely understanding the consequences. Although it’s not an easy fix, the challenge of breaking down these silos is relatively simple. Focus your efforts on the senior leadership team. Once they have been encouraged to share, collaborate, and support each other, the silos will dissolve as quickly as they were erected.